Apr28th2005

“Black Rednecks and White Liberals”

So goes the title of Thomas Sowell’s new book. It is published this week by Encounter Books, and is already pre-ordered by yours truly. :) Sowell, in promotion for his new book, recently was on the editorial section of the Wall Street Journal.

He writes:

For most of the history of this country, differences between the black and the white population–whether in income, IQ, crime rates, or whatever–have been attributed to either race or racism. For much of the first half of the 20th century, these differences were attributed to race–that is, to an assumption that blacks just did not have it in their genes to do as well as white people. The tide began to turn in the second half of the 20th century, when the assumption developed that black-white differences were due to racism on the part of whites.

Three decades of my own research lead me to believe that neither of those explanations will stand up under scrutiny of the facts. As one small example, a study published last year indicated that most of the black alumni of Harvard were from either the West Indies or Africa, or were the children of West Indian or African immigrants. These people are the same race as American blacks, who greatly outnumber either or both.

If this disparity is not due to race, it is equally hard to explain by racism. To a racist, one black is pretty much the same as another. But, even if a racist somehow let his racism stop at the water’s edge, how could he tell which student was the son or daughter of someone born in the West Indies or in Africa, especially since their American-born offspring probably do not even have a foreign accent?

What then could explain such large disparities in demographic “representation” among these three groups of blacks? Perhaps they have different patterns of behavior and different cultures and values behind their behavior.

He goes on to give some historical facts and writes:

Slavery also cannot explain the difference between American blacks and West Indian blacks living in the United States because the ancestors of both were enslaved. When race, racism, and slavery all fail the empirical test, what is left?

Culture is left.

The culture of the people who were called “rednecks” and “crackers” before they ever got on the boats to cross the Atlantic was a culture that produced far lower levels of intellectual and economic achievement, as well as far higher levels of violence and sexual promiscuity. That culture had its own way of talking, not only in the pronunciation of particular words but also in a loud, dramatic style of oratory with vivid imagery, repetitive phrases and repetitive cadences.

Although that style originated on the other side of the Atlantic in centuries past, it became for generations the style of both religious oratory and political oratory among Southern whites and among Southern blacks–not only in the South but in the Northern ghettos in which Southern blacks settled. It was a style used by Southern white politicians in the era of Jim Crow and later by black civil rights leaders fighting Jim Crow. Martin Luther King’s famous speech at the Lincoln Memorial in 1963 was a classic example of that style.

While a third of the white population of the U.S. lived within the redneck culture, more than 90% of the black population did. Although that culture eroded away over the generations, it did so at different rates in different places and among different people. It eroded away much faster in Britain than in the U.S. and somewhat faster among Southern whites than among Southern blacks, who had fewer opportunities for education or for the rewards that came with escape from that counterproductive culture.

Nevertheless the process took a long time. As late as the First World War, white soldiers from Georgia, Arkansas, Kentucky and Mississippi scored lower on mental tests than black soldiers from Ohio, Illinois, New York and Pennsylvania. Again, neither race nor racism can explain that–and neither can slavery.

The redneck culture proved to be a major handicap for both whites and blacks who absorbed it. Today, the last remnants of that culture can still be found in the worst of the black ghettos, whether in the North or the South, for the ghettos of the North were settled by blacks from the South. The counterproductive and self-destructive culture of black rednecks in today’s ghettos is regarded by many as the only “authentic” black culture–and, for that reason, something not to be tampered with. Their talk, their attitudes, and their behavior are regarded as sacrosanct.

The people who take this view may think of themselves as friends of blacks. But they are the kinds of friends who can do more harm than enemies.

The whole article is worth your time, and for those who haven’t read much of Sowell, I strongly recommend you do, here are several of his articles.

Update: Thomas Sowell has more.

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • del.icio.us
  • YahooMyWeb

6 Responses to ““Black Rednecks and White Liberals””


  1. Gravatar Icon 1 steve risher Apr 28th, 2005 at 6:05 pm

    How does Sowell explain the disproportionately high levels of
    steet crime among Blacks in the UK?
    http://www.globalblacknews.com/UKPrison.html

  2. Gravatar Icon 2 steve risher Apr 28th, 2005 at 6:11 pm

    http://www.lewrockwell.com/spectator2/spec593.html
    According to the British Crime Survey, 31 per cent of all street robberies in Britain are committed by criminals of African-Caribbean origin, while at least 60 per cent of all muggings in London are perpetrated by blacks.

  3. Gravatar Icon 3 Hispanic Pundit Apr 28th, 2005 at 6:48 pm

    I haven’t read his book yet, so I couldn’t say. But I doubt he would talk much about the UK, maybe his book on affirmative action around the world would touch on it? I’m only guessing though…

  4. Gravatar Icon 4 jesus Apr 29th, 2005 at 2:51 pm

    Although i haven’t read his latest book yet, i do agree with the exegesis of it.
    I have read his book “Applied Economics” though, and his logically conclusions are very palatable. Thomas Sowell is a genius as far as i’m concerned.

  5. Gravatar Icon 5 Fernando May 2nd, 2005 at 6:29 pm

    Yeah!!! I got a pretty large dose of what that means “In another board THAT I use to go into.”

    Now what was worse is that the Board, which is mainly democrat, did not
    put a stop to it.

    Now here is the brain teaser, could the democrats’ chief goal be
    Separation, as well as a victimization of Latinos in order to get better controll? After all most of their support comes from the African American community, and of course they see the Latino vote as a major threat
    To their political power.

  6. Gravatar Icon 6 Rich A May 3rd, 2005 at 3:25 pm

    Fernando! That is an interesting take on that situation. I never looked at it from that perspective. Sadly, you might be right. I think the last election has the Democratic party desperate to reverse the trend where over 40% of Latinos vote Republican.

Leave a Reply