“[E]ven after his two terms were over, when left-wing news sources sourly continued to portray his administration solely in terms of its faults, as nothing but a big deficit and the Iran-Contra scandal, I cannot remember Reagan ever ‘defending his legacy’ with anything more than a quip and a smile. Compare and contrast Clinton… ‘And you got that little smirk on your face and you think you’re so clever,’ Clinton told [Fox News’ Chris] Wallace, sounding for all the world like a 6-year-old girl scolding her playground rival. He then proceeded to try to rewrite his coulda-woulda-shoulda presidency by claiming to have had a much more focused and hard-lined approach to terrorism than any reading of his administration can support. Even Clinton counter-terrorism chief Richard Clarke’s book — which Clinton cited repeatedly during his tantrum — shows the president as too weak to order Osama bin Laden’s death. Other accounts are much less favorable” –novelist Andrew Klavan, writing in the Los Angeles Times.


Reagan hardly spoke in public after his term. He was pretty much gone at that point.
I read Clark’s bood. It does not say he was too weak. Itxs point is that he could not get the political capital to go over Osama becasue Republicans were too obsessed with Monica to focus on terrorism.