The Reality Of Affirmation Action

Gail Heriot, professor of law at the University of San Diego and a member of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, in an article titled, Affirmative Action Backfires, in the Wall Street Journal writes:

Three years ago, UCLA law professor Richard Sander published an explosive, fact-based study of the consequences of affirmative action in American law schools in the Stanford Law Review. Most of his findings were grim, and they caused dismay among many of the champions of affirmative action — and indeed, among those who were not.

Easily the most startling conclusion of his research: Mr. Sander calculated that there are fewer black attorneys today than there would have been if law schools had practiced color-blind admissions — about 7.9% fewer by his reckoning. He identified the culprit as the practice of admitting minority students to schools for which they are inadequately prepared. In essence, they have been “matched” to the wrong school.

No one claims the findings in Mr. Sander’s study, “A Systemic Analysis of Affirmative Action in American Law Schools,” are the last word on the subject. Although so far his work has held up to scrutiny at least as well as that of his critics, all fair-minded scholars agree that more research is necessary before the “mismatch thesis” can be definitively accepted or rejected.

Unfortunately, fair-minded scholars are hard to come by when the issue is affirmative action. Some of the same people who argue Mr. Sander’s data are inconclusive are now actively trying to prevent him from conducting follow-up research that might yield definitive answers. If racial preferences really are causing more harm than good, they apparently don’t want you — or anyone else — to know.

Mr. Sander’s original article noted that when elite law schools lower their academic standards in order to admit a more racially diverse class, schools one or two tiers down feel they must do the same. As a result, there is now a serious gap in academic credentials between minority and non-minority law students across the pecking order, with the average black student’s academic index more than two standard deviations below that of his average white classmate.

Not surprisingly, such a gap leads to problems. Students who attend schools where their academic credentials are substantially below those of their fellow students tend to perform poorly.

The reason is simple: While some students will outperform their entering academic credentials, just as some students will underperform theirs, most students will perform in the range that their academic credentials predict. As a result, in elite law schools, 51.6% of black students had first-year grade point averages in the bottom 10% of their class as opposed to only 5.6% of white students. Nearly identical performance gaps existed at law schools at all levels. This much is uncontroversial.

Supporters of race-based admissions argue that, despite the likelihood of poor grades, minority students are still better off accepting the benefit of a preference and graduating from a more prestigious school. But Mr. Sander’s research suggests that just the opposite may be true — that law students, no matter what their race, may learn less, not more, when they enroll in schools for which they are not academically prepared. Students who could have performed well at less competitive schools may end up lost and demoralized. As a result, they may fail the bar.

Specifically, Mr. Sander found that when black and white students with similar academic credentials compete against each other at the same school, they earn about the same grades. Similarly, when black and white students with similar grades from the same tier law school take the bar examination, they pass at about the same rate.

Yet, paradoxically, black students as a whole have dramatically lower bar passage rates than white students with similar credentials. Something is wrong.

The Sander study argued that the most plausible explanation is that, as a result of affirmative action, black and white students with similar credentials are not attending the same schools. The white students are more likely to be attending a school that takes things a little more slowly and spends more time on matters that are covered on the bar exam. They are learning, while their minority peers are struggling at more elite schools.

Mr. Sander calculated that if law schools were to use color-blind admissions policies, fewer black law students would be admitted to law schools (3,182 students instead of 3,706), but since those who were admitted would be attending schools where they have a substantial likelihood of doing well, fewer would fail or drop out (403 vs. 670). In the end, more would pass the bar on their first try (1,859 vs. 1,567) and more would eventually pass the bar (2,150 vs. 1,981) than under the current system of race preferences. Obviously, these figures are just approximations, but they are troubling nonetheless.

Mr. Sander has his critics — some thoughtful, some just strident — but so far none has offered a plausible alternative explanation for the data. Of course, Mr. Sander doesn’t need to be proven 100% correct for his research to be devastating news for affirmative-action supporters.

Suppose the consequences of race-based admissions turn out to be a wash — neither increasing nor decreasing the number of minority attorneys. In that case, few people would think it worth the costs, not least among them the human costs that result from the failure of the supposed beneficiaries to graduate and pass the bar.

Under current practices, only 45% of blacks who enter law school pass the bar on their first attempt as opposed to over 78% of whites. Even after multiple tries, only 57% of blacks succeed. The rest are often saddled with student debt, routinely running as high as $160,000, not counting undergraduate debt. How great an increase in the number of black attorneys is needed to justify these costs?

The article goes on to discuss recommendations the civil rights commission is making mainly regarding transparency. The full article can be found here. Responses from the article can be found here.

Update: More here.

18 Responses to “The Reality Of Affirmation Action”

  • It’s interesting indeed to see empirical studies on the subject. In essence they back up the logic put forth decades ago by the skeptics.

    Think about it: If I am in the market for legal advice, and I interview a dark-skinned attorney whose diploma reads University Of Michigan, am I likely to regard his credentials on the same plane as his cousin (or a lawyer of any color) from another univarsity?

  • I wanted to thank you for this very good read!! I certainly enjoyed every bit of it.
    I’ve got you book-marked to check out new things you post…

  • Fantastic beat ! I would like to apprentice even as you amend your web site, how could i subscribe
    for a weblog website? The account aided me a applicable deal.
    I had been a little bit acquainted of this your broadcast provided
    shiny transparent concept

  • Hi there, I read your blog like every week. Your writing
    style is awesome, keep doing what you’re doing!

  • What’s up mates, its wonderful paragraph on the topic of tutoringand entirely defined, keep it
    up all the time.

  • Hey, you used to write magnificent, but the last several
    posts have been kinda boring… I miss your tremendous writings.
    Past several posts are just a little bit out of
    track! come on!

  • I am sure this piece of writing has touched all the internet viewers, its really really
    nice paragraph on building up new weblog.

  • Very good post! We are linking to this particularly great
    article on our site. Keep up the great writing.

  • I’ll right away take hold of your rss feed as I can not find your email subscription hyperlink or newsletter service.
    Do you’ve any? Please let me understand in order that I may just subscribe.

  • Sweet blog! I found it while searching on Yahoo News.
    Do you have any tips on how to get listed in Yahoo News?
    I’ve been trying for a while but I never seem to get there!
    Thank you

  • I do accept as true with all of the ideas you have offered on your post.
    They are very convincing and will certainly work.
    Nonetheless, the posts are very brief for beginners.
    Could you please extend them a little from subsequent time?
    Thank you for the post.

  • I always used to study article in news papers but
    now as I am a user of internet thus from now I am using net for
    content, thanks to web.

  • I read this piece of writing fully concerning the difference
    of hottest and earlier technologies, it’s amazing article.

  • Thank you for the auspicious writeup. It actually was a leisure account it.
    Glance complex to far introduced agreeable from you!
    By the way, how could we keep in touch?

  • Great delivery. Outstanding arguments. Keep up the amazing effort.

  • I don’t know if it’s just me or if perhaps everybody else encountering
    problems with your site. It appears as if some of the text within your content are running
    off the screen. Can someone else please provide feedback and let me know if this is happening to them as well?
    This may be a issue with my internet browser because I’ve had this happen previously.
    Appreciate it

  • It’s remarkable to pay a quick visit this site and reading the views of all colleagues on the topic of this article, while
    I am also eager of getting knowledge.

  • wonderful post, very informative. I ponder why the other specialists of this sector
    don’t realize this. You should proceed your writing. I am confident,
    you’ve a huge readers’ base already!

Leave a Reply