The Traps Of Universal Healthcare

The New York Times writes about a cancer patient in the British Health Care System:

Debbie Hirst’s…breast cancer had metastasized, and the health service would not provide her with Avastin, a drug that is widely used in the United States and Europe to keep such cancers at bay. So, with her oncologist’s support, she decided last year to try to pay the $120,000 cost herself, while continuing with the rest of her publicly financed treatment.

By December, she had raised $20,000 and was preparing to sell her house to raise more. But then the government, which had tacitly allowed such arrangements before, put its foot down. Mrs. Hirst heard the news from her doctor.

“He looked at me and said: ‘I’m so sorry, Debbie. I’ve had my wrists slapped from the people upstairs, and I can no longer offer you that service,’ ” Mrs. Hirst said in an interview.

“I said, ‘Where does that leave me?’ He said, ‘If you pay for Avastin, you’ll have to pay for everything’ ” — in other words, for all her cancer treatment, far more than she could afford.

Officials said that allowing Mrs. Hirst and others like her to pay for extra drugs to supplement government care would violate the philosophy of the health service by giving richer patients an unfair advantage over poorer ones.

Greg Mankiw has more.

47 Responses to “The Traps Of Universal Healthcare”

  • Gregory D. Pawelski

    The anecdote from the United Kingdom has nothing to do with any traps of universal healthcare.

    According to NCI’s official cancer information website on “state of the art” chemotherapy for breast cancer, it is unclear whether single-agent chemotherapy or combination chemotherapy is preferable for first-line treatment. No data support the superiority of any particular regimen.

    Avastin is not the only drug that can be used to treat breast cancer. The idea that approving drugs based on “population studies” has its limits. What may or may not work for the average population may not apply to the “individual.”

    What should be at issue is not on the types of expensive drugs that are being developed and if universal healthcare will pay for them, but on the understanding of all the drugs we already have (many of them cheap). The system is overloaded with drugs and underloaded with the wisdom and expertise for using them.

    A major obstacle in controlling cancer drug prices is the widespread inappropriate use of anti-cancer drugs. As the increasing numbers and types of anti-cancer drugs are developed, oncologists become more and more likely to misuse them in their practice.

    Knowing the drug sensitivity profile of a specific cancer patient can allow the treating oncologist to prescribe a therapy that will be the most effective against the tumor cells, before placing these expensive and potentially toxic agents into the patient.

    Pharmaceutical companies focus their research on diseases with a broad base, and prefer developing drugs that customers can be counted on to take for many years. However, they have come to recognize that cancer drugs can be profitable, if the price is high enough and the disease is serious enough to treat. They have discovered that many patients will tolerate high prices, and demand payment, if their lives depended on them.

    Too many drugs shrink tumors but don’t bring about any survivability. And too many drugs makes it difficult for oncologists to sort out which drugs are most effective alone or in combination, and in what sequence. The result is millions of dollars is spent producing tumor-shrinking drugs that often offer no improved survival, no better quality of life, and no added safety to patients.

  • I get all of that and to a large degree agree with what you are saying. However, the point of the post is different.

    The question I am raising is: Should they lose basic benefits if they choose to pay for these marginal services with their own money?

  • Gregory D. Pawelski

    Okay. I can go along with that. But the title is a little deceiving. This anecdote has nothing to do with it being an example of a trap in universal healtcare coverage. Health care is not a commodity, when human life is concerned. In universal healthcare coverage, doctors will still be independent contractors and everyone will have relative access to health care. I’m sure that people with money will try to circument the system, just as they do under the for-profit system. But I feel they will not be as successful at it. And there will be the potential for waiting for service, just as it happens under the for-profit system.

  • Well, the way the British Health Care System responded does make it a trap. It basically said that if you use the British Health Care System you have to only use the British Health Care System. You cannot use your own money to get superior health care benefits somewhere else.

  • Gregory D. Pawelski

    A good example of the U.S. health care system in this regard is nursing home residents under medicaid/medicare. You cannot use your own money (or from relatives) to pay the difference to get a superior private room, instead of a semi-private room. You either take the semi-private room or pay for the private room out of your own pocket. Before anyone says anything about medicaid/medicare being like a so-called “socialized” system, the Medicare Part D Prescription Benefit Plan is a perfect example that it’s not. This administration set up dozens of for-profit entities (by bribery) to compete with medicare, and medicare still does a better job at it.

  • So the way I see it you have four scenarios:

    Case UK1: British person has no private healthcare but gets free (albeit not the best) cancer treatment.

    Case UK2: British person either is rich or has private healthcare that offers the best treatment on top of free healthcare treatment.

    Case US1: US person has no private healthcare and gets no treatment.

    Case US2: US person either is rich or has private healthcare taht offers the best treatment on top of free healthcare treatment.

    UK definitely looks better here. At least you get something!

  • Not so, the USA has healthcare for the poor. It’s called medicaid.

    Experience with that is one of the many reasons why I am against more single-pay healthcare.

  • To be honest, I’m not familiar with medicaid. I know it exists but I have never experienced it nor have I heard anything good about it. I’m assuming somebody with standard British healthcare fares a better chance than somebody who just has medicaid.

  • Medicaid is health insurance for the poor. So its simply not true that the poor have no healthcare.

    Btw, if your argument is that medicaid is inefficient (which I agree)…then on what justification do you suggest we increase government control of healthcare? It seems to me that if we cant get the healthcare thing right for those who need it most (the poor) chances are we would make it even worse for those more well off. Don’t you think?

  • To be honest, I have no clue. I don’t know enough about healthcare. I’d love to study it in detail and look at what other countries are doing. Surely, they are making mistakes, but I’m willing to believe that we can learn from anybody.

    I do think that 40 million uninsured Americans is unacceptable. Our healthcare system is not functioning at a sufficient level if such a high percentage of Americans cannot afford healthcare, especially since many of these people are hard working individuals. This is the same, in my humble opinion, as saying that 25% unemployment during the Great Depression is unacceptable. Our economic system did not work then just as our healthcare system does not work now.

    Just as we evolved automatic economic stabilizers to maintain acceptable economic levels of unemployment and inflation, I think we should do the same for healthcare. Just as government policy and private stimuli are used to maintain acceptable levels, we should find a similar solution. How that will happen, I’m not sure. I don’t claim to know much about healthcare but I’m sure a solution is out there.

    Every decision has a cost, right? I suppose we just have to balance out what we are willing to give in order to get something a bit more acceptable.

    The 40 million Americans without insurance are not part of the current inputs into the healthcare industry. Servicing them will not necessarily have such a negative impact since they were not inputs to begin with. Servicing them will only increase the market perhaps similar to how the government increases investment and the money supply but purchasing bonds. Thus this possibly could create further growth within the industry?

  • I do think that 40 million uninsured Americans is unacceptable. Our healthcare system is not functioning at a sufficient level if such a high percentage of Americans cannot afford healthcare, especially since many of these people are hard working individuals.

    This is a big assumption. Remember, ‘the poor’ already have health insurance…medicaid. So if you have 40 million uninsured, you have to immediately be suspect as to what their status is – cuz poor is certainly not it.

    Greg Mankiw sheds light on who exactly these people are (I highly recommend the full article as well):

    “To start with, the 47 million includes about 10 million residents who are not American citizens. Many are illegal immigrants. Even if we had national health insurance, they would probably not be covered.

    The number also fails to take full account of Medicaid. the government’s health program for the poor. For instance, it counts millions of the poor who are eligible for Medicaid but have not yet applied. These individuals, who are healthier, on average, than those who are enrolled, could always apply if they ever needed significant medical care. They are uninsured in name only.

    The 47 million also includes many who could buy insurance but haven’t. The Census Bureau reports that 18 million of the uninsured have annual household income of more than $50,000, which puts them in the top half of the income distribution. About a quarter of the uninsured have been offered employer-provided insurance but declined coverage”.

    Many more are probably recent college graduates in their early 20’s who don’t need health insurance and would rather be compensated in the form of higher pay than in a coverage they will rarely use. I know I would.

    So again, this ‘tregedy’ you speak of is anything but.

  • Hmm, you know, you are absolutely right. 47 million isn’t bad, and I’m sure all of those people either don’t need it, don’t deserve it, or don’t want it. Medicaid is also sufficient as well for those who don’t have “normal” insurance.

  • Now you are going too far. I never said it wasn’t bad, I never said ‘all’.

    My belief is that it is ‘bad’ just not the tragedy many make it out to be.

  • Hispanics have asked and HAVE recieved for the American goverment, substancial aid.

    Do the Hispanics understand, you have to work for a living?(other then the easy way selling drugs)

    America is in a crisis, because the Hispanics take…take…and don’t want to give back.

    That is why, it’s not a racist thing…but America is on it’s knees, Hispanics, want ppl to feed them, and not work

  • We have a young hispanic girl at work…she popped out 3 kids, she is only 19.

    She got her stimuls check, ( 1500 ) did she save it to buy school clothes for her 3 kids? No she got a freaken tatoo.

    Went out drinking, bought cocaine…financed by the US Government…

  • I suppose the most rational course of action to any issue is to use a singular anecdotal piece of evidence and apply it to an entire subset, thus accurately proving a point predecided by personal bias.

  • Anecdotal evidence is not everything…but its also not nothing. Its also, btw, a criticism one make to both sides of the health care debate.

  • I directed that at Joni’s comment. I’m not really sure where it fits in the healthcare debate. Just sounds like a poorly veiled rant against hispanics and the fact that we all use government handouts to buy crack.

  • Back in the good ol’ Rick Roll days, I replaced the sound for opening a folder with Never Gonna Give You Up. I named the sound file “you’ve been rickrolled” for when he eventually figured it out. That was good for a laugh.
    replica bvlgari serpenti tubogas yellow gold

  • おもてなしなど、かにをご馳走したいとき、そんなときはネットで、北海道など産地から直接お取り寄せできるサイトを購入先の候補にしてください。おいしく食べられる量を調理しましょう。



  • 有名なかにの産地は、旅行先としても大人気ですが、旅行しなくても有名産地のかにを食べたい人のために販売もしてくれるところもあり、ありがたいですね。次に考慮するのが、美味しいかには直送に限る、ということです。3つ目のポイントがズバリ、「口コミ」です。100パーセント正しいことを言っているという保証はありませんが、参考にするには便利なものと言えます。


  • 当時は、生ものの発送という画期的な試みがいやだと抵抗を感じる人も多かったので、物好きな人が通販でかにを買ったのはいいのですが、産地に行って食べるものとの違いが大きく、その辺のスーパーで売っているものよりひどいと聞いて絶対に買うのはよそうと思ったものです。



  • 昨今のかに人気で、通販のかにを食べたことがある人も多いと思いますが、期待はずれだったり価格が適正でないということを言い出すことも珍しくありませんでした。カタログなどでイメージしていた商品と実物とのギャップが原因となることがほとんどです。あとは業者の対応に関することですね。


  • 家族が食べたいだけのかにを購入するといったい何十キロになるのか、重さ制限がなくいくらでも買えるのはおとりよせでしかありえないですね。何キロになったとしても制限はありませんし、


  • G90Iwv lgeqiajasfkz, [url=]fgzzyrzdhegj[/url], [link=]cgghwilvsuus[/link],

  • Having read this I thought it was extremely enlightening.
    I appreciate you spending some time and effort to put this content together.

    I once again find myself personally spending a significant amount of time both reading and posting comments.
    But so what, it was still worthwhile!

  • I read this paragraph completely on the topic of the
    resemblance of hottest and earlier technologies, it’s awesome article.

  • hello there and thank you for your info – I have definitely picked up
    anything new from right here. I did however
    expertise a few technical issues using this site, since I experienced to reload the site lots of times previous to I could get it to load properly.

    I had been wondering if your web host is OK? Not that I am complaining, but
    slow loading instances times will often affect your placement
    in google and could damage your high-quality score if advertising and marketing with Adwords.
    Well I am adding this RSS to my email and could look out for much more
    of your respective fascinating content. Ensure that you update this again soon.

  • This paragraph is truly a good one it helps new the web viewers, who are wishing for blogging.

  • Hi there, of course this paragraph is genuinely fastidious and I
    have learned lot of things from it about blogging. thanks.

  • Hi to every one, for the reason that I am actually eager of reading this
    blog’s post to be updated on a regular basis.
    It carries nice information.

  • Very good information. Lucky me I discovered your website by accident (stumbleupon).
    I have saved as a favorite for later!

  • You’ve made some decent points there. I looked on the internet for additional information about the issue
    and found most people will go along with your views on this site.

  • I am curious to find out what blog platform
    you have been using? I’m having some minor security issues with my latest
    blog and I would like to find something more secure.
    Do you have any solutions?

  • Hi there! This is my first visit to your blog! We are a collection of volunteers and starting a
    new initiative in a community in the same niche. Your
    blog provided us beneficial information to work on. You have done a marvellous job!

  • I like this weblog very much, Its a really nice post to
    read and obtain information.

  • I would like to use the ability of thanking you
    for the professional instruction I have usually enjoyed viewing your site.
    I am looking forward to the commencement of my college research and the overall prep would never have been complete without surfing this site.
    If I might be of any help to others, I’d be glad
    to help by way of what I have learned from here.

  • We’re a gaggle of volunteers and opening a new scheme
    in our community. Your website provided us with valuable info to work on.
    You’ve done a formidable activity and our entire community might be
    grateful to you.

  • Awesome things here. I’m very happy to see your post.
    Thank you so much and I am taking a look forward to touch you.

    Will you please drop me a mail?

  • Great beat ! I wish to apprentice whilst you amend your
    site, how can i subscribe for a blog website? The account helped me a appropriate deal.
    I were tiny bit familiar of this your broadcast offered shiny clear concept

  • Right here is the perfect blog for anybody who really
    wants to find out about this topic. You know a whole lot its almost tough to argue with you (not that I actually would
    want to…HaHa). You definitely put a new spin on a topic that’s been discussed for many years.

    Wonderful stuff, just excellent!

  • It’s the best time to make some plans for the future and it’s
    time to be happy. I’ve learn this publish and if I could I want to recommend you some attention-grabbing issues or
    suggestions. Perhaps you can write subsequent articles regarding this article.

    I desire to learn even more issues approximately it!

  • Hi there are using WordPress for your blog platform?
    I’m new to the blog world but I’m trying to get started and set up my own. Do you
    require any coding expertise to make your own blog? Any help would be greatly appreciated!

  • Thanks in support of sharing such a pleasant opinion, post is
    good, thats why i have read it entirely

  • This piece of writing offers clear idea in support of the new viewers of blogging, that in fact how to do blogging.

  • Hi there, I found your site via Google at the same
    time as searching for a comparable subject, your website came up, it seems great.
    I have bookmarked it in my google bookmarks.
    Hi there, simply become alert to your blog via Google, and located that
    it is really informative. I am gonna be careful for brussels.
    I will be grateful when you proceed this in future.
    A lot of other people shall be benefited from your writing.


  • かには高価で滅多に手の届かないもの。そんな常識を打ち破り、それほど無理のない金額で量もそこそこ。そんなお店があったらいいですよね。食べたい時に食べたいだけ注文するにはかにの通販がいつでもどこでもインターネットや電話で注文できてお手軽だと話題です。



Leave a Reply