Undoubtedly, Obama’s new paramilitary forces will be employed to kill the old people and young children.

Grand Old Partisan Michael Zak explains:

On July 2, 2008, Barack Obama announced: “We cannot continue to rely on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we’ve set. We’ve got to have a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded.”

Obama’s Civilian National Security Force:

What sort of people would be in this paramilitary force?
What sort of weapons would they have?
Who would command them?
Would they be subordinate to the U.S. military?
Would they be subordinate to the police?
What would be the purpose of this paramilitary force?
What would it do?

And, what are Obama’s “national security objectives?”

Michelle Obama lifts back the curtain hiding Barack’s plans for a new order:

“Barack Obama will require you to work. He is going to demand that you shed your cynicism. That you put down your divisions. That you come out of your isolation. That you move out of your comfort zones. That you push yourselves to be better. And that you engage. Barack will never allow you to go back to your lives as usual, uninvolved, uninformed.”

Yikes!

A community organizer gets frustrated when people refuse to get organized voluntarily in response to the manipulation of the organizer.

So the solution for this community organizer is simple. Make them get organized. One important activity for this Security Force is to identify those who are anti-social and not supportive of the common good. This is done so that they can be sent to sensitivity training and re-education camps for their own personal growth.

Not in my America, no way, no how. Obama will be stopped before he does the unthinkable to America.

Though Eyes of Texas speaks in hyperbole, me thinks he is essentially right: Obama probably does support modern day euthanasia policies, like the one passed in Oregon.

Regarding “the health of the mother”: “health of the mother” can be used for ANY reason. If a woman walks into an abortion clinic at 8 months and says, “you know, I’ve been having really bad morning sickness, I want an abortion”…guess what, that qualifies as “health of the mother”. This is why pro-lifers have fought vigorously to remove that clause. Even the most ardent abortion foes make exceptions when the mothers health is truly at risk – like when its life or death for her – so pro-lifers don’t want to remove that qualification if they thought it would really harm the mother. They do it because they know how it is interpreted legally.

Obama, as a lawyer knows this…so when he says he wants a ban on late term abortion that includes the health of the mother clause, he is is saying he would support a partial birth abortion ban only if that ban was made to be completely unenforceable. McCain explained this to him in the third debate (which Obama as a lawyer certainly already knew) and Obama refused to address the claim.

He is the one who values the health of one family maember over the life of another.

As far as abortion. Sarah Palin is a complete hypocrite but she is too stupid to realize it.

She talks about how her daughter and her discussed hep pregnancy and They made the CHOICE to keep the baby. They just made the argument for the pro-choice movement. Nobody is in favor of aboortions. The pro-choice movement argues for a women’s right to do exactly what Sarah Palin and Bristol did let the mother make the CHOICE - not the government. Which one is the socialist?