<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Pattern With Democrats</title>
	<link>http://hispanicpundit.com/2009/03/27/a-pattern-with-democrats/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 03:42:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: HispanicPundit</title>
		<link>http://hispanicpundit.com/2009/03/27/a-pattern-with-democrats/#comment-203077</link>
		<dc:creator>HispanicPundit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 16:17:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hispanicpundit.com/2009/03/27/a-pattern-with-democrats/#comment-203077</guid>
		<description>Actually, I think the kind of tax cuts we are discussing, payroll tax cuts in the fiscal stimulus, are the best. If I had it my way the majority of the stimulus would have been payroll tax cuts, see why &lt;a href="http://econlog.econlib.org/archives/2009/01/smart_stimulus.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://econlog.econlib.org/archives/2009/01/the_case_for_st.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://hispanicpundit.com/2009/01/14/a-better-stimulus-plan/" rel="nofollow"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;. 

But yeah, I think they were too small! :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, I think the kind of tax cuts we are discussing, payroll tax cuts in the fiscal stimulus, are the best. If I had it my way the majority of the stimulus would have been payroll tax cuts, see why <a href="http://econlog.econlib.org/archives/2009/01/smart_stimulus.html" rel="nofollow">here</a>, <a href="http://econlog.econlib.org/archives/2009/01/the_case_for_st.html" rel="nofollow">here</a> and <a href="http://hispanicpundit.com/2009/01/14/a-better-stimulus-plan/" rel="nofollow">here</a>. </p>
<p>But yeah, I think they were too small! <img src='http://hispanicpundit.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LaurenceB</title>
		<link>http://hispanicpundit.com/2009/03/27/a-pattern-with-democrats/#comment-203074</link>
		<dc:creator>LaurenceB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 16:02:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hispanicpundit.com/2009/03/27/a-pattern-with-democrats/#comment-203074</guid>
		<description>Fair enough.

So, to recap your position...

Republicans, who voted en masse against the stimulus bill, are responsible for the tax cuts in the stimulus bill.  Those tax cuts were not the good kind of tax cuts, they were the bad kind.  Plus, the tax cut was so small, it deserves to be ridiculed.  The Republicans should be congratulated.

And to recap my position...

I got a tax cut.  I with I hadn't.  I blame Obama.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fair enough.</p>
<p>So, to recap your position&#8230;</p>
<p>Republicans, who voted en masse against the stimulus bill, are responsible for the tax cuts in the stimulus bill.  Those tax cuts were not the good kind of tax cuts, they were the bad kind.  Plus, the tax cut was so small, it deserves to be ridiculed.  The Republicans should be congratulated.</p>
<p>And to recap my position&#8230;</p>
<p>I got a tax cut.  I with I hadn&#8217;t.  I blame Obama.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HispanicPundit</title>
		<link>http://hispanicpundit.com/2009/03/27/a-pattern-with-democrats/#comment-202673</link>
		<dc:creator>HispanicPundit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 18:04:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hispanicpundit.com/2009/03/27/a-pattern-with-democrats/#comment-202673</guid>
		<description>What Mankiw is referring to is the specific type of tax cuts Obama had promised. He didn't promise a payroll tax cut, he promised specific tax cuts (or more accurately, tax rebates, see &lt;a href="http://hispanicpundit.com/2008/10/27/quote-of-the-day-578/" rel="nofollow"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;) and &lt;i&gt;those&lt;/i&gt; promises are now being rescinded. 

Semantics maybe, but still a promise unkept.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What Mankiw is referring to is the specific type of tax cuts Obama had promised. He didn&#8217;t promise a payroll tax cut, he promised specific tax cuts (or more accurately, tax rebates, see <a href="http://hispanicpundit.com/2008/10/27/quote-of-the-day-578/" rel="nofollow">here</a>) and <i>those</i> promises are now being rescinded. </p>
<p>Semantics maybe, but still a promise unkept.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LaurenceB</title>
		<link>http://hispanicpundit.com/2009/03/27/a-pattern-with-democrats/#comment-202670</link>
		<dc:creator>LaurenceB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 17:29:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hispanicpundit.com/2009/03/27/a-pattern-with-democrats/#comment-202670</guid>
		<description>I think you kinda missed my point.  I would not say "Thanks Republicans!" any more than I would say "Thanks Obama!", because I think the tax cut was a bad idea.

But, having said that, you and are in agreement that there has already been a tax cut, and it's a bit misleading for Mankiw not to take note of that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you kinda missed my point.  I would not say &#8220;Thanks Republicans!&#8221; any more than I would say &#8220;Thanks Obama!&#8221;, because I think the tax cut was a bad idea.</p>
<p>But, having said that, you and are in agreement that there has already been a tax cut, and it&#8217;s a bit misleading for Mankiw not to take note of that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HispanicPundit</title>
		<link>http://hispanicpundit.com/2009/03/27/a-pattern-with-democrats/#comment-202669</link>
		<dc:creator>HispanicPundit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 16:41:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hispanicpundit.com/2009/03/27/a-pattern-with-democrats/#comment-202669</guid>
		<description>Ah yes, the ~$40/month. Thanks Obama!

But, if we wanted to be more precise, we should really say Thanks Republicans! Since Obama wanted almost no tax cuts in the "fiscal" stimulus bill as well - it was the Republicans that strong armed him and the Democrats into adding significant tax-cuts to the bill. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah yes, the ~$40/month. Thanks Obama!</p>
<p>But, if we wanted to be more precise, we should really say Thanks Republicans! Since Obama wanted almost no tax cuts in the &#8220;fiscal&#8221; stimulus bill as well - it was the Republicans that strong armed him and the Democrats into adding significant tax-cuts to the bill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LaurenceB</title>
		<link>http://hispanicpundit.com/2009/03/27/a-pattern-with-democrats/#comment-202660</link>
		<dc:creator>LaurenceB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 14:48:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hispanicpundit.com/2009/03/27/a-pattern-with-democrats/#comment-202660</guid>
		<description>First, I'll give my personal opinion - since we are going to have a huge spending increase, I think it is a bad idea to have tax cuts.

Now having said that, contra Mankiw, I believe a middle class tax cut has already happened and, therefore, Obama has already come through on his promise.  It was part of the stimulus bill.

About three weeks ago I got this email from my office payroll department:

&lt;blockquote&gt;
You may notice a small increase (approximately $20) in your net pay this week.  This is the result of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA), commonly known as the Stimulus Bill.

You can compare the federal income tax withheld from your pay dated February 27th with the federal income tax withheld on today’s pay to see the exact difference.

If you have any questions or concerns, please give me a call. 

Kathleen Indermill
Payroll Accountant
The Weather Channel Companies
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I'm assuming pretty much everyone else noticed the same thing in their paychecks.  Isn't that a tax cut?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First, I&#8217;ll give my personal opinion - since we are going to have a huge spending increase, I think it is a bad idea to have tax cuts.</p>
<p>Now having said that, contra Mankiw, I believe a middle class tax cut has already happened and, therefore, Obama has already come through on his promise.  It was part of the stimulus bill.</p>
<p>About three weeks ago I got this email from my office payroll department:</p>
<blockquote><p>
You may notice a small increase (approximately $20) in your net pay this week.  This is the result of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA), commonly known as the Stimulus Bill.</p>
<p>You can compare the federal income tax withheld from your pay dated February 27th with the federal income tax withheld on today’s pay to see the exact difference.</p>
<p>If you have any questions or concerns, please give me a call. </p>
<p>Kathleen Indermill<br />
Payroll Accountant<br />
The Weather Channel Companies
</p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;m assuming pretty much everyone else noticed the same thing in their paychecks.  Isn&#8217;t that a tax cut?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.186 seconds -->

