Why Are Companies Eager To Support Cap And Trade?

Why would companies be eager to support something that would be a cost on them? Because it would be an even bigger cost on their competition:

 I think they see it as a way to keep the competition at bay.  “Cap and trade” is essential to the Obama plan.  If emission permits cost $20 per ton (per year, presumably), “then cap and trade might add $460 million a year to Alcoa’s annual operating costs.”  That sounds pretty painful for Alcoa stockholders.  But Alcoa is pushing for a plan in which the government gives, “companies like Alcoa nearly enough free permits in the early years of cap and trade to cover emissions.”  In fact, there seems to be some expectation that Alcoa may get so many permits that it would have surplus permits to sell.  What looks like a self-sacrificing corporation rising above itself to act in the social benefit turns out to be ordinary rent seeking.

And Alcoa is not the only established business in a position to enjoy such largess.  “The White House has signaled a willingness to provide financial offsets and other relief to the states and companies that would be hit hardest by new cap and trade rules.”  Existing firms are subsidized and startups are taxed simultaneously.  Welcome to the brave new world tiresome old world of “partnership” between business and government.

The full post can be found here.

3 Responses to “Why Are Companies Eager To Support Cap And Trade?”


  • Definitely believe that that you stated. Your favorite justification appeared
    to be at the web the simplest thing to understand of.
    I say to you, I certainly get irked while other folks think about
    worries that they just don’t know about. You managed
    to hit the nail upon the top and also outlined out the whole thing without having side effect , other folks could take a signal.
    Will likely be again to get more. Thanks

  • Yes! Finally something about fast passports.

  • Precisely what I was looking for, regards for putting up.

Leave a Reply