<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who To Trust: Government Or Competition?</title>
	<link>http://hispanicpundit.com/2009/07/29/who-to-trust-government-or-competition/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 05:23:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Why Oppose The Public Option? at Hispanic Pundit</title>
		<link>http://hispanicpundit.com/2009/07/29/who-to-trust-government-or-competition/#comment-214801</link>
		<dc:creator>Why Oppose The Public Option? at Hispanic Pundit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 07:47:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hispanicpundit.com/2009/07/29/who-to-trust-government-or-competition/#comment-214801</guid>
		<description>[...] is the argument that it is a trojan horse for single payer.  Single payer results in less competition, less innovation and longer wait [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] is the argument that it is a trojan horse for single payer.  Single payer results in less competition, less innovation and longer wait [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cockroach People</title>
		<link>http://hispanicpundit.com/2009/07/29/who-to-trust-government-or-competition/#comment-213061</link>
		<dc:creator>Cockroach People</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 04:10:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hispanicpundit.com/2009/07/29/who-to-trust-government-or-competition/#comment-213061</guid>
		<description>This is a great post. Centralized and concentrated government power is problematic.  But such power is also problematic for private organizations when they become monopolistic or too big.  I like Henry Simons' credo:

"I hope that [mycomments] are fragments of one intelligible general
position.... The underlying position may be characterized as
severely libertarian or, in the English-Continental sense, liberal.
The intellectual tradition is intended to be that of Adam Smith...
Marshall ... and Knight, and of Locke, Hume, Bentham .. . and
Hayek. The distinctive feature of this tradition is emphasis upon
liberty as both a requisite and means of progress...A cardinal tenet of libertarians is that no one may be trusted with much power—no leader, no faction, no party, no “class,” no majority, no government, no church, no corporation, no trade association,
no labor union, no grange, no professional association, no university, no large organization of any kind."


In general, I trust private organizations over government in most instances--there is no question.  But the current crisis reminds me that trust should never be blind.  Government intervention to get us back on track may be warranted, but I would not want to replace a privately-run disaster for a government-run disaster.  I hope we will get to the heart of the regulatory break-down (perhaps enforcing existing regulations rather than adopting half-ass symbolic measures with no teeth--echoing a post on Professor Becker's blog a while back).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a great post. Centralized and concentrated government power is problematic.  But such power is also problematic for private organizations when they become monopolistic or too big.  I like Henry Simons&#8217; credo:</p>
<p>&#8220;I hope that [mycomments] are fragments of one intelligible general<br />
position&#8230;. The underlying position may be characterized as<br />
severely libertarian or, in the English-Continental sense, liberal.<br />
The intellectual tradition is intended to be that of Adam Smith&#8230;<br />
Marshall &#8230; and Knight, and of Locke, Hume, Bentham .. . and<br />
Hayek. The distinctive feature of this tradition is emphasis upon<br />
liberty as both a requisite and means of progress&#8230;A cardinal tenet of libertarians is that no one may be trusted with much power—no leader, no faction, no party, no “class,” no majority, no government, no church, no corporation, no trade association,<br />
no labor union, no grange, no professional association, no university, no large organization of any kind.&#8221;</p>
<p>In general, I trust private organizations over government in most instances&#8211;there is no question.  But the current crisis reminds me that trust should never be blind.  Government intervention to get us back on track may be warranted, but I would not want to replace a privately-run disaster for a government-run disaster.  I hope we will get to the heart of the regulatory break-down (perhaps enforcing existing regulations rather than adopting half-ass symbolic measures with no teeth&#8211;echoing a post on Professor Becker&#8217;s blog a while back).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.180 seconds -->

