“If you did a simple cost-benefit comparison, the Obama plan vs. a simple extension of Medicaid, more R&D through the NIH, and some targeted public health expenditures, I believe the latter would win hands down. And the latter seems more politically feasible too. It avoids the mandate, the unworkable and ridiculously low penalties for those who don’t sign up for insurance, and the awkwardly high implicit marginal tax rates imposed by the subsidy scheme. It probably involves fewer corporate and “back room” deals….When it comes to the Obama plan, the easy targets are stupid or hypocritical Republicans. The hard target is why the plan should beat the alternative reforms I’ve outlined above or perhaps other ways of spending the money. I’d like to see more people take on the hard target rather than the easy.” — Tyler Cowen
Search
Recent Comments
- What Is The Cause Of Poverty Among Minorities? Not Race… | Women, the economy, and what I have discovered on What Is The Cause Of Poverty Among Minorities? Not Race
- Lanny on Housing Projects And Their Significance To Our Education System
- value my car on Quote Of The Day
- Jon on Quote Of The Day
- Joy on In Defense Of For-Profit Colleges
RSS
- Quote Of The Day 5/8/2013
- Quote Of The Day 3/11/2013
- Quote Of The Day 2/21/2013
- Quote Of The Day 1/18/2013
- The Scamming Beggar 12/1/2012
It’s so cute to find someone who still believes, after all that we’ve seen, that Republican politicians are even a little bit interested in health reform. It makes you want to pat Tyler on the head and leave a quarter under his pillow next time he loses a tooth.
“…more politically feasible…” (chuckle)
I just think that’s just so sweet.