<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Retirement Age</title>
	<link>http://hispanicpundit.com/2010/09/07/the-retirement-age/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 14:11:59 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://hispanicpundit.com/2010/09/07/the-retirement-age/#comment-247347</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2010 11:29:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hispanicpundit.com/2010/09/07/the-retirement-age/#comment-247347</guid>
		<description>Reminds me of this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=acLW1vFO-2Q</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reminds me of this:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=acLW1vFO-2Q" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=acLW1vFO-2Q</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HispanicPundit</title>
		<link>http://hispanicpundit.com/2010/09/07/the-retirement-age/#comment-246806</link>
		<dc:creator>HispanicPundit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 06:16:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hispanicpundit.com/2010/09/07/the-retirement-age/#comment-246806</guid>
		<description>I would prefer the former. I enjoy that year end bonus...and will spend it better than the government would. :-) 

Seriously though, pegging the "retirement age" to changes in life expectancy is not really changing social security - it's merely keeping it up to date with the times. 

Whereas increasing the maximum cap is indeed a fundamental change, and I would argue, for the worse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would prefer the former. I enjoy that year end bonus&#8230;and will spend it better than the government would. <img src='http://hispanicpundit.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Seriously though, pegging the &#8220;retirement age&#8221; to changes in life expectancy is not really changing social security - it&#8217;s merely keeping it up to date with the times. </p>
<p>Whereas increasing the maximum cap is indeed a fundamental change, and I would argue, for the worse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LaurenceB`</title>
		<link>http://hispanicpundit.com/2010/09/07/the-retirement-age/#comment-246753</link>
		<dc:creator>LaurenceB`</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 15:36:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hispanicpundit.com/2010/09/07/the-retirement-age/#comment-246753</guid>
		<description>I remember a point in my life, a long time ago, when I discovered that I had graduated into a higher income tax bracket and around November - voila! - my taxes were cut and my paycheck got bigger!

"Strange", I thought.  I didn't think it worked that way.

It turns out I had passed the maximum threshold for social security contributions.  Cool!  And ever since then, every year I look forward to that wonderful time of year when my paycheck (and those of millions of other well compensated Americans) suddenly gets much larger.

As much as I enjoy it though, I can't help but wonder why it even exists.  Is it really necessary to provide what is essentially a tax cut to the better off?  And if we got rid of that maximum annual contribution how far would that go to resolving the future fiscal problems with Social Security?

I guess my point is that given the choice - increasing the retirement age to bolster Social Security coffers, or simply doing away with the maximum annual contribution to accomplish the same purpose, I would definitely prefer the latter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember a point in my life, a long time ago, when I discovered that I had graduated into a higher income tax bracket and around November - voila! - my taxes were cut and my paycheck got bigger!</p>
<p>&#8220;Strange&#8221;, I thought.  I didn&#8217;t think it worked that way.</p>
<p>It turns out I had passed the maximum threshold for social security contributions.  Cool!  And ever since then, every year I look forward to that wonderful time of year when my paycheck (and those of millions of other well compensated Americans) suddenly gets much larger.</p>
<p>As much as I enjoy it though, I can&#8217;t help but wonder why it even exists.  Is it really necessary to provide what is essentially a tax cut to the better off?  And if we got rid of that maximum annual contribution how far would that go to resolving the future fiscal problems with Social Security?</p>
<p>I guess my point is that given the choice - increasing the retirement age to bolster Social Security coffers, or simply doing away with the maximum annual contribution to accomplish the same purpose, I would definitely prefer the latter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.196 seconds -->

